About Me

My photo
Greetings. I am the Illusive One. For many years now I have been a huge video game player, movie viewer, and book reader. For almost as long, I have been a critic of these things and many people respect my opinions of these things and have often said I belong on G4 doing reviews on X-Play or a similar show. Sadly that is not likely to happen. So instead I shall do reviews for you, uninfluenced by other reviewers, of video games books, movies, and, occasionally, music and political actions. I hope you find this informative and helpful. Thank you for your time.
Showing posts with label The Dudeletter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Dudeletter. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

The Seventh Seal


            There are many films that are considered masterpieces and for good reason.  Some for their plot, some for their innovative film making techniques and some for their special effects.  However, there are quite a few that can stand toe to toe with many of these masterpieces in some way or another and are often utterly obscure.  And today I am going to talk about one of those obscure films.  This is the Illusive One's Review of The Seventh Seal.

            Released in 1957, the film was a Swedish production, directed by Ingmar Bergman and starred a very young Max von Sydow.  While it's not incredibly obscure, it's not one that too many people talk about or even know about which is a shame.  I myself hadn't even heard about it until Netflix recommended it.  The plot revolves around the knight Antonius Block, (Sydow), as he is returning home from the crusades disillusioned and very world weary.  On his way back he encounters Death and challenges him to a game of chess in order to postpone his own death and try to find some kind of meaning in life and explores the themes of faith, death and the meaning of life.
            One the positive side you had a great story for starters.  If you're like me, however, you might be disappointed that there is relatively little screen time of the knight and Death actually playing chess.  Most of the film focuses on the knight, his squire Jons, and various people they encounter on the way to the knight's castle as the Black Death ravages Europe and the characters confront their own personal demons concerning faith, death, morality, and the meaning of life itself.  While it wasn't what I expected, I cannot deny that it was one that was very well executed, full of tense and emotional moments and kept me interested from beginning to end.
            Another thing this film really got right were the characters, as each was entertaining and memorable in their own way.  For starters, you had Antonius the knight who was incredibly acted by Sydow and he really came off as believable as a world weary knight with a crisis of faith.  The only problem I really had was that he seemed to be a tad thin for the part and this made him look a bit out of place.  You also had the squire Jons, who was incredibly enjoyable as a hilarious cynic who laughed at the prospect of death, a serious man of his time and intimidating and badass all at once.  In my personal opinion, his dialog was the best in the film being both enjoyable and serious with themes just as powerful as knight’s talks with death and other people.  Even the characters that were relatively minor and forgettable were entertaining in some way.  The black smith and his wife added an entertaining subplot and the way Jons worked off the blacksmith was just hilarious.
            Along with these characters you had great dialog frequently dealing with issues of faith, life, death, love, and morality.  There were also quite a few scenes in this film I really enjoyed such as the witch burning where the knight asks the witch if he can talk to the Devil, Jons’ conversations with the painter, the blacksmith, and the group eating strawberries together one afternoon.
            The last really good thing I have to mention about this film was the general set design as they made an incredibly convincing medieval environment.  Everything I saw on film, from the castles, to the inns, to the churches, to the food, to the food bowls I could honestly believe were from that era.
            However, I would be lying if I said this film didn’t have flaws.  For starters, the figure of Death was hit or miss throughout this film.  At times he was really creepy and intimidating and at others he just seemed underwhelming and dull.  The actor Jof was a good character but something seemed a bit off about his performance at times.  Like it was written for him to have a certain reaction but fails to show it.  Granted a lot of that has to do with the general directorial style but it still bothered me. 
While on the subject, I couldn’t help but notice that the cinematography, editing and general directorial style was hit and miss throughout this film.  The editing wasn't great, particularly during any violent scenes where said violence was cut out and some of it seemed a bit choppy.  A lot of the shots seemed a bit static and a little to centered at times, and makes you aware that you're watching a movie.  While many scenes in this film were great and full of tension, I couldn't help but feel that several could have been a lot better.  Some scenes just didn't have the right lighting, and some didn't have the right camera movements.  It was just a number of little things that added up and kept the film from having an artsy, physiological quality to it that films like Apocalypse Now! and Blade Runner have, despite the fact that it seemed like that was the mood the film was going for. 

            All around, I would recommend this film to anyone who has an interest in older films, isn't depressed, and can watch a film in a foreign language.  The characters, acting and dialog were all good, even when they seemed a bit off, and made the film incredibly enjoyable.  The general directorial style, however, keeps it short of classic and really shows the age of the film.  It seemed like the makers were trying to go for an Exorcist type feel to it, where the viewer takes from the film what they brought, but the ultimate visual execution kept this from being possible.  Once again, I would recommend this film but don't expect anything ground breaking and expect to have a lot more questions than answers by the film's end.

All Around
7.75/10


Until next time, this is the Illusive One wishing you all luck in your own game of chess with death.

Wednesday, August 10, 2011

Batman: The Killing Joke

            Over the past couple of months, I've found myself repeating that I'm not much of a fan of comic books, yet lately I can't stop talking about them in some form or another.  And I've found yet another comic book I want to review.  Even though I don't read too many comic books, anything with Alan Moore or Batman in the title always grabs my attention.  The final push I needed to read something like this was a single cover that could draw me into its 46 page book.  And not too long ago I found something with all three qualities.  This is The Illusive One's Review of Batman: The Killing Joke.

            Written by Alan Moore and illustrated by Brian Bolland in 1988, The Killing Joke is often considered to be one of the greatest Joker themed Batman Story ever made and changed the entire cannon of the Batman series as well as serving as a major inspiration for the 1989 film Batman and the 2008 film The Dark Knight.  But how well does it hold up today to a relative new comer to the area like myself?  The plot of it revolves around the Joker as he has once again escaped from Arkham Asylum, (WHEN ARE THEY GOING TO LEARN THAT THAT PLACE CAN'T HOLD HIM?!), kidnaps Commissioner Gordon, and tries to prove that it only takes one traumatic experience to bring people to his level while flashing back to his apparent past.

            On the positive side, the majority of the drawing style was great.  The coloring was great, the blood was great, and the attention to detail was great.  It was also a well written story with good dialog and decent plot structure.  I also felt that some of the ways they decided to take the story were bold and welcome, (such as having Barbra Gordon crippled by the Joker).  Although a lot of people didn't like the ending of this comic, I loved it and found myself laughing my ass off with The Dark Knight and the Joker, (although I'm not entirely sure why).  Even though the Joker's past was a major part of the story I like the way they kept it a bit ambiguous; by the end you're not sure if the flash backs you saw were real or just part of the Joker's insanity.  I also loved how insane the Joker was in this comic, as he constantly killed and shot people almost at random.  His ultimate goal of trying to prove that only one bad day stands between the average person and insanity was something that actually got under my skin.  The last but greatest thing about this comic was how it analyzed the relationship between Batman and the Joker.  It showed their deadly rivalry and how it would probably escalate until one of them killed the other but also showed a kind of kindred spirit between the two; how traumatic events changed both of their lives and how they adapted to them.

            On the negative side, I honestly felt that this comic was too short.  To me, it almost seemed like it should have been thirty to sixty pages longer but was somehow cut short.  As a result, the Joker's plan of driving Gordon insane seemed a bit underwhelming.  I also felt that there was a little too much focus on the Joker's past and not enough directly on the rival of Batman and the Joker.  While I do know that Batman’s blue and gray outfit is his classical look it's not one that holds up very well today and I couldn't help but be distracted by it.  The last negative thing I have to say about this comic is that I didn't particularly care for the way the Joker looked in it.  His face just seemed way to long and his neck seemed way to thin.  Maybe that's nitpicking but it's something I couldn't help but be distracted by.

            All around, this was defiantly a comic that was well worth my time.  While I found the Joker's plan to be slightly underwhelming, it made up for it with its themes and analysis of the characters.  What else can I say?  I don't read too many D.C. Comics but this one certainly makes me want to read more.  If you're like me and don't read to many comic books and are a fan of Batman and the Joker I'd recommend at least picking it up at a library and take the time to read it.  It was well worth my time and I'm sure it will be worth yours.

All Around
8/10
  
So until next time this is the Illusive One saying There were these two guys in a lunatic asylum and one night, one night they decide they don't like living in an asylum any more. They decide they're going to escape! So, like, they get up onto the roof, and there, just across this narrow gap, they see the rooftops of the town, stretching away in the moon light... stretching away to freedom. Now, the first guy, he jumps right across with no problem. But his friend, his friend didn't dare make the leap. Y'see... Y'see, he's afraid of falling. So then, the first guy has an idea... He says 'Hey! I have my flashlight with me! I'll shine it across the gap between the buildings. You can walk along the beam and join me!' B-but the second guy just shakes his head. He suh-says... He says 'Wh-what do you think I am? Crazy? You'd turn it off when I was half way across!

GAH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!