Well, everyone, I seem to have
gotten into another rut where I can’t seem to finish any of the games I’ve been
playing lately so it’s time for another movie review. And today it is time to review the latest
Bond film, Skyfall. Now, I have to admit that I am not the
biggest Bond fan in the world. I liked
some of the earlier Sean Connery films that dealt with his battles against S.P.E.C.T.E.R.
and the Dalton films but for the most part I was never really able to get into
them. The villains were just too cheesy,
the plots to ridiculous and some of the gadgets they came up with in these
movies were just…bizarre. That’s not to
say that I hate these films but I was just never able to get into them the way a
lot of other people were.
However, back in 2006, the reboot Casino Royal was released and holy hot
damn was it good. The acting was
fantastic, the action was great and the storyline was able to successfully modernize
the franchise, making it plausible in our world and many consider it to be one
of the better Bond films out there. And
then we had Quantum of Solace. Now, I
don’t mean to jump on the band wagon and hate on this movie but it was really underwhelming
and an unworthy follow up to its predecessor and felt more like a written out
additional act of Casino then it did
a sequel. And after four years of
waiting we have the next entry in Craig/Bond series, Skyfall.
Apparently taking place several
years after the events of Quantum,
the story of Skyfall revolves around
Bond, who after nearly dying and leaving MI6 returns to duty after a cyber-terrorist
attacks MI6 and begins leaking the names of various undercover agents around
the world who apparently has a grudge against “M” and it’s up to 007 to track
this terrorist down, save “M” from this madman, and ultimately decided if he
still wants to be a part of MI6 and it’s horrors.
So what’s good about this
movie? Well, like its predecessors, the
acting is fantastic and the writing for the characters is up to par with the
performances. Daniel Craig once again
proves that he is the best Bond by all at once being badass, charming,
sociopathic, but is still able to show that he is still a fallible human and
has his own personal demons. For the
first time he really seems to question his life choices and we get a bit more
of his background which had been lacking in previous films. Judi Dench is once again fantastic as “M” in
her seventh film appearance as the character and like Bond, we get a bit more
of her backstory and find that she is a fallible leader and that it’s very
possible that her time as MI6’s leader is coming to a close. Javier Bardem is probably the weakest of the
main cast but is still very effective as the flamboyant cyber-terrorist, Silva
and made for an interesting dark contrast to Bond. Naomie Harris was great as Eva and the flirtatious
relationship she has with Bond is delightful to watch. Ben Whishaw was a welcome addition as the new
“Q” giving us a new modern version of the character as well as paying homage to
the old versions. Perhaps the biggest
surprise in the casting, however, was Ralf Fiennes as the bureaucrat, Gareth
Mallory, who was cast against type as “M”’s only real ally in the elected
government and as a result he gives his best performance in years. Albert Finney is also great in his role but
sadly I can’t reveal to much more due to spoilers.
While the main storyline of the film
does leave something to be wanted, (more on that in a minute), a lot of the
themes they explore are worth noting. The
main one seemed to have been the role of organizations like MI6 and agents like
Bond who seem to becoming increasingly obsolete in the 21st century
and I find it really interesting that anyone would dare tackle that idea. The ending is fantastic and really gives the
sense that it’s time for Bond to become the big franchise that it once was. It’s also full of a lot of great tributes to
the older films such as the mentioning of an exploding pen and the appearance
of the car from Goldfinger and you
really get a sense that the people who made this film have a love for the
franchise, and are not deprived of humor.
I was also very pleased by the
special effects as the director seems to be one of the few directors out there
that understands that practical effects done well will almost always look
better then CGI. The final positive to
note is opening theme, Skyfall as it
was a radical improvement over the last song and I could listen to it for hours
without any context.
However, the film suffers from four
big problems and quite frankly I find them impossible to ignore. The first is that it really has next to
nothing to do with the previous films in terms of its story. There is no mention of Mr. White or the
Quantum organization and I really wanted to see a continuation of that storyline. The second is the themes they explore in the
film, such as “M”’s past, the role of MI6, and Bond questioning his role in MI6
and whether or not he wants to be a part of it.
While these themes are great, I don’t think that they pushed them far
enough and believe that they could have made a masterpiece out of this film if
they had. The third problem is the
action scenes. One of my big problems
with Quantum was that many of the
action scenes felt like they were recycled from older Bond films and ultimately
felt stale. Here, however, it’s very
obvious that this is the director’s first action movie and as a result the
action scenes are not very well shot or edited together. In one scene, for example, you get a hand to
hand combat fight with Bond and an assassin and almost all of it is done in one
shot with little to no editing. It ultimately
comes off as similar to the action of The
Dark Knight, where many of the hand to hand fights were under edited and
just came off as underwhelming.
And speaking of similarities to The Dark Knight, I hate to be this kind
of person, but this movie ripped a little too much off of the 2008 Batman film and once you see these similarities
they are impossible to ignore and will take away from the experience. The most notable were several plot elements
that were ripped straight out of the film, including a brief sequence that took
place in China that led to the main story and the villain allowing himself to
get captured in order to achieve his goal with a plan that some people might
say was unnecessarily complicated, (and I might add that with this film that
argument would have a lot more merit).
This wouldn’t have bothered me so much if The Avengers hadn’t done the exact same thing back in May, (and
much more effectively I might add), and as a result it just comes off as a bit
of a stale plot point. The final
similarity is, believe it or not, the score.
While the Skyfall opening theme
is original and the classical James Bond
theme is unmolested, the rest of the score that doesn’t involve these things
sounds WAY to similar to Hans Zimmer’s score in the Dark Knight Trilogy and Inception. I’ve heard some people take this a step
further by saying that the relationship between Bond and villain Silva was a
little too similar to that of Batman and the Joker but I don’t really see it
and even I think that that is taking the similarities to far.
All around I would say that this
film was better than Quantum but not
as good as Casino. The acting, characterization, humor, themes
and tributes to the older films are all great but it was taken down a few
notches by failing to really push these themes, action scenes that left
something to be wanted and a little too much lifted from The Dark Knight. It seemed
like they were trying to do for the Bond franchise what The Dark Knight did for comic book movies, but ultimately failed to
understand what made that film so good and just ended up lifting plot points
from it. However, if you liked the first
two, are a Bond fan and want to see a more serious take on the franchise then
this is a film for you. It successfully adds
on to a great Bond story arc and I honestly cannot wait to see what they do
next.
All
Around
8/10
Seems like someone nedds to watch more Bond movies before critiquing.
ReplyDeleteBond movies regualarly take a break from regualr villains to address side villains, often for far more iconic ones. In the past, SPECTRE and SMERSH were sidelined for the likes of Goldfinger and Jaws among others. Quantum is no exception to Silva, and in QoS, they adressed that they have gone undergound to some extent thanks to pressure from MI6 - they will liekly come back resurgent next film.
The spy who faces the same villain continuously isn't James Bond, it's Austin Powers.
Yeah, you are stetching things when it comes to comparing Skyfall to the Dark Knight big time. That kind of person = contrarian?
The action scenes are wildly different - camera angles alone differ, TDK had shakey cam, whearas Skyfall had steady studio cam. Plus, the action scenes for Skyfall ahve been widely praised.
Bond was doing the globetrotting thing long before Dark Knight was a glimmer in Chris Nolan's eye. Plus, unlike Batman, Bond has precadence in goint there. Dark Knight is was done to tep into the Chinese Box Office - James Bond has gone to China in five of his last ten films.
The story of a hero meating his match and wondering if he is still up for it, or even still relavent outdates both Bond and Dark Knight - the story trope is older than Beowulf.
Sktfall's score was much more classical bent than Zimmers usual hard industrial. Compre Skyfall's subdued orchastras to TDK's overbearing one note chords. There is a dicernable difference.
And there is a key difference between Silva and the Joker. Silva has a backstory, motive, a viable skillset, a reasoning behind his actions and goals, and acts as a dark mirror of James Bond. Joker has none of the above.
Food for thought. Fantastic film.